Readify

Stefania Tchornenko–Adèle Skolyk relationship

Felix Austria

The relationship between Stefania Tchornenko and Adèle Skolyk is the novel’s central entanglement of lifelong intimacy and unequal service. They grow up together and remain closely bound, but the bond is never simply reciprocal: Stefania’s devotion takes the form of unending care, while Adèle’s affection coexists with her power as mistress of the household. Their closeness sustains both women and confines Stefania, turning love into labor and loyalty into a difficult obstacle to leaving.

A shared life built on care

Stefania and Adèle have been together since childhood, and even Adèle’s honeymoon with Petro includes Stefania. Petro objects to the arrangement and agrees only after Adèle has spent several nights weeping at the prospect of travelling without her. During the month away, Stefania organizes the couple’s hotel meals to suit Adèle, fetches fresh cream for her coffee, arranges her hair, prepares and cleans her clothes, and fastens them on her. Adèle confides that Petro is captivated by her scent; Stefania connects that intimacy to her own work preparing Adèle’s bath and bringing the oils and herbal preparations used on her body. The episode makes the bond’s structure plain: Adèle’s married life is closely attended by Stefania’s service, while Stefania experiences such attention as an expression of their shared life.

That service extends well beyond travel and grooming. At home, Stefania changes buckets beneath a leaking roof, cooks and cleans, shops for provisions, and carries Petro’s lunch to the cathedral or prison chapel while also caring for Adèle and preparing iron-studded apples to help with her anemia. The distribution of labor is not merely practical. Stefania’s description of herself as remaining at Adèle’s side makes the work part of an emotional commitment, while the household’s dependence on that work leaves Stefania with little space to pursue a life of her own.

Attachment, obligation, and unequal authority

The bond is reinforced by Stefania’s memory of Doctor Anger’s deathbed charge. She recalls him comparing the two women to tree trunks grown together and telling her that she must serve Adèle. Stefania treats those words as a lasting command: she imagines that Adèle could not survive without her, citing her weakness, anemia, migraines, and inability to manage even simple cooking. Although she considers leaving for a monastery or another position, she cannot bring herself to abandon Adèle. Her sense of obligation is therefore sustained both by her fear for Adèle and by a promise she understands as binding.

The meaning of the doctor’s metaphor is disputed. When Stefania repeats his words to Father Josef, he suggests that intertwined trees prevent one another from growing. Stefania rejects the implication that she has misheard, and the exchange exposes how completely she has made service the meaning of the relationship. What she receives as a duty to preserve closeness may also describe a bond that restricts both women. Stefania remembers the instruction as something that continues to drive her daily tasks, turning work into a kind of prayer for Adèle.

Their history also includes repeated quarrels. Stefania recalls earlier cycles of complaint, anger, tears, apologies, and renewed disputes, sometimes beginning again in the middle of the night after a seeming reconciliation. She remembers Adèle calling her a slave as a child and later accusing her of stealing Doctor Anger’s watch. Another quarrel arose when Adèle wanted Stefania to dress her before a concert, but Stefania instead had to address fleas in the bedding because the doctor’s poor sleep could endanger a surgical patient. The injuries of these conflicts remain available to Stefania in precise detail, even as she says she has learned to swallow her bitterness and continue working. Her stated priority is not to establish justice but to make Adèle’s life easier.

Love interpreted through work and belonging

Stefania’s care becomes especially visible in food. When she cannot find peace, she turns to cooking; preparing dishes allows her to resume living. She describes herself through the qualities of the food she serves and says she would give herself entirely so that Adèle and Petro will eat. When they do not, she reads their refusal as a sign that she is unwanted or despised. Cooking is thus both concrete household labor and the language through which Stefania measures whether her affection has been received.

Adèle also presents their closeness as the result of sustained effort. Speaking to Ernest Thorn, she says that servants must be educated, raised, and instructed, comparing the process to training. She insists that it can succeed only with humane treatment, friendly understanding, and intimacy, and explains that Doctor Anger began Stefania’s education in infancy while she continued it. In Adèle’s account, tenderness is not separate from authority; it is the method by which authority is made acceptable. Her claim that Stefania is treated with familial warmth therefore sits beside an explicit defense of the mistress’s right to train and direct her.

Stefania’s work is sometimes acknowledged as indispensable. When she prepares a birthday gathering, the guests praise the food, but she reminds herself that the company has eaten and forgotten her, leaving her to prepare, cook, bake, wash, clean, and mend. Petro carries a loaded tray with her and tells her that without her the household could not have become a home and that she is family. The recognition matters, but it does not erase the contrast between Stefania’s place in the household and her status as its servant: gratitude arrives in a private moment of shared work, while the guests enjoy what she has made.

Possession, conflict, and changing boundaries

A story about Doctor Anger refusing to sell Stefania to Mademoiselle Zuza becomes, in Stefania’s mind, proof that he loved her as a daughter. Adèle later explains the refusal as practical: the family had invested too much effort in educating Stefania to replace her with another servant. Stefania suspects that Adèle is jealous and deliberately diminishing the doctor’s attachment; she imagines that his anger at the proposal was evidence of a special love for her. After hearing the story, Stefania repeatedly threatens to pack for Mademoiselle Zuza whenever she and Adèle quarrel, though she knows she will never actually leave the Anger household. The episode shows how both women interpret the same history to define Stefania’s place: Adèle stresses the labor invested in a servant, while Stefania claims the refusal as evidence of personal, filial affection.

The deepest rupture comes when Adèle accepts Thorn’s offer of money in exchange for Stefania’s child. Stefania confronts her with the older wound of the proposed sale to Mademoiselle Zuza, accusing Adèle of having feared that Doctor Anger loved Stefania as a second child. She asks why Adèle would now agree to sell the child, and Adèle is visibly frightened. Petro separates them as Stefania struggles against him and then collapses. The confrontation brings their long-standing imbalance into the open: the devotion Stefania has given Adèle does not prevent Adèle from exercising power over what Stefania most values, and Stefania’s attachment can turn suddenly into furious resistance.

Later life and the unresolved bond

At a later point Stefania works in two households, maintaining order and cleanliness and cooking in both. She discovers that she has more strength than she expected. Adèle still invokes their dependence in teasing terms, warning Stefania not to leave because she could not manage without her, even as Stefania braids her hair. The exchange retains the intimacy of their shared routine but also repeats its governing premise: Adèle relies on Stefania’s presence, and Stefania continues to provide the care that makes that reliance possible.

The relationship remains unresolved between affection and constraint. Adèle calls Stefania family and speaks of tender treatment, but also describes her as a servant shaped by education and training. Stefania’s own love is genuine, yet it is bound to a deathbed command, a fear that Adèle cannot survive alone, and the practical work that fills her days. Their shared life is neither simple sisterhood nor merely a household arrangement: it is a durable attachment in which intimacy gives service its emotional meaning, while the unequal terms of service repeatedly test what that intimacy can bear.